Allahabad High Court
WRIB/4243/2026 of KALYAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERS Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4243 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide the stay
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 4243 of 2026
Court No. - 51
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide the stay application filed alongwith Revision No. 6235 of 2025, within a specific period as fixed by this Court.
3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the aforesaid revision filed by the petitioners is pending since December, 2025 before respondent no. 1. Submission is that till date the stay application filed alongwith revision has not even considered and decided while notices have been issued to the contesting respondents. Therefore, a suitable direction be issued to the respondent no. 1 to decide the stay application at the earliest.
4. Having considered the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and the considering the facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide the stay application filed alongwith aforementioned revision, in accordance with law, within a period of two months months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. Respondent no. 1 shall also make all endeavours to decide the revision itself within a period of six months thereafter in terms of the provision contained in Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. September 23, 2026 Ashok Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Sagar Verma, Rahul Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh (Arun Kumar,J.) Kalyan Singh And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad