Allahabad High Court
CRLP/19252/2025 of VIMAL RAJ Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19252 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19252 of 2025
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 03-05-2025 registered as Case Crime No. as well as FIR No. 105 of 2025, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station - Kotwali, District - Kanpur Nagar (Annexure No. 4) to the writ petition).
ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest the petitioner and protect the personal life and liberty of the petitioner in pursuance of impugned F.I.R dated 03-05-2025 registered as Case Crime No. as well as FIR No. 105 of 2025, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Kanpur Nagar."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has been forwarded and cognizance has already been taken by the Court concerned. He further submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the aforesaid fact.
3. Learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State has not contradicted the facts as submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and Mr. S.K. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Divyesh Singh Bisen, Vijay Bahadur Shivhare Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Satya Sinha Vimal Raj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that the charge sheet has been forwarded and cognizance has already been taken by the Court concerned and no objection form learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 23, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 19252 of 2025 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad