Allahabad High Court
A227/13257/2026 of SUNITA DEVI Vs SADANAND MAURYA AND ANOTHER on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13257 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. To pass an order directing to the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur to decide Application 25Ga
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13257 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. To pass an order directing to the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur to decide Application 25Ga dated 15.05.2025 pending in O.S. No.389/2019 (Sunita Devi Vs Sadanand Maurya and another), expeditiously within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. (Annexure No. 2)"
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that plaintiff- petitioner instituted a suit for specific performance in which application 25C has been preferred, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the application 25C filed in Original Suit No. 389/2019 (Sunita Devi Vs. Sadanand Maurya and another), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Shukla, Ayush Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sunita Devi .....Petitioner(s) Sadanand Maurya And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad