Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22030/2026 of CHANDRAJEET YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22030 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following relief: "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22030 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following relief: "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to conclude the fair and proper investigation in pursuance of first information report dated 25.09.2025, which was registered as Case Crime No. 0375 of 2025, under Section 147, 452, 323, 504, 506, 427, 394, 307 of I.P.C., Police Station Mau Aima, District Ganganagar (Commissionerate Prayagraj) and taken necessary step to arrest the accused person i.e. respondent nos. 4 to 7.
(ii) . Issue any suitable writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.
3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that in instant matter after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been forwarded against respondent no.7 only and respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 have been exonerated.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Munna Babu, Naveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Chandrajeet Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge sheet has already been forwarded to the Court concerned, we do not find any reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. September 21, 2026 SK Srivastava CRLP No. 22030 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad