Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22063/2026 of SHIVAM CHATURVEDI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22063 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22063 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 21.6.2026 (Annexure no.1 to this writ petition) as registered the Case Crime No 0350/2026 Under Section 74 B.N.S Police Station Kotwali Orai District Jalaun.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 2not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. dated 21.6.2026 (Annexure no.1 to this writ petition) as registered the Case Crime No 0350/2026 Under Section 74 B.N.S Police Station Kotwali Orai, District Jalaun."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been forwarded before the court concerned, cognizance thereupon has been taken, and charge has also been framed on 29.08.2026.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Shivam Chaturvedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been forwarded, cognizance has been taken and charge has been made, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 21, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22063 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad