Allahabad High Court
A482/25315/2024 of MUKHBIR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS Vs State of U.P. AND ANOTHER on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25315 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Shyam Babu Vaish, learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State and perused the records. The
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25315 of 2024
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
5
Decisions referred to
In this index
5
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Shyam Babu Vaish, learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State and perused the records. The supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record.
2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: "It, is therefore most respectfully prayed that this hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 2059 of 2013 (State of U.P. vs. Mukhbir Singh & others) arising out of Case Crime no. 68 of 2013, U/s 498-A, 323, 504, I.P.C. Police Station Mahila Thana, District Kanpur Nagar, as well as N.B.W. order dated 22.05.2015 pending in the court of A.C.J. (J.D.) VII Kanpur Nagar on the basis of Compromise dated 10.07.2024 occurred between both parties."
3. Learned Counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have compromised the dispute. It is further argued that the said compromise has also been verified by the concerned Trial Court, as such the proceedings against the applicants may be quashed.
4. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 admitted the fact of compromise and stated that he has no objection if the proceeding of the aforesaid case is quashed against the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shyam Babu Vaish Mukhbir Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. From the perusal of the record it is apparent that parties have entered into compromise and have settled their dispute amicably.
6. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of
(1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed.
7. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings as prayed for by the applicants.
8. The entire proceedings of the aforesaid case with regard to the present applicants are hereby quashed.
9. The present application is allowed.
September 21, 2026 Vijay A482 No. 25315 of 2024 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad