WRIC/36465/2026 of RAJNATH RAM Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 20 September 2026

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36465 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. It is contended that the petitioner has already filed civil suit and since there is no injunction order, private respondents are unnecessarily interfering with the rights of the petitioner to raise constructions upon the demolished structure, which according to him belongs to him. Once the petitioner has already instituted a suit, he should pursue the remedy available in the civil suit. In the circumstances, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter. However, we still provide that in the event petitioner approaches the court with an urgency application within a period of two weeks from today, his temporary injunction application shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law after hearing the parties to the suit within next two months time. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. September 21, 2026 IrfanUddin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kashi Nath Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Rajnath Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad