Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11879/2026 of INSAD ALI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11879 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11879 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari and quash the impugned First Information Report dated 12.05.2026 (filed as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition) registered as Case Crime No. 0253 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 333, 308(5), 329(3) BNS, Police Station Surajpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar.
(ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to not to arrest the petitioner pursuant to the impugned First Information Report dated 12.05.2026 (filed as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition) registered as Case Crime No. 0253 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 333, 308(5), 329(3) BNS, Police Station Surajpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3 has apprised the Court that notice of the case has been served upon learned counsel for the petitioner through WhatsApp, in support whereof the relevant document has been placed on record and is taken on record.
3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghan Shyam Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dinesh Rai, G.A., Stuti Rai Insad Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted to the court concerned.
4. Heard Mr. Dinesh Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted to the court concerned, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed.
September 21, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 11879 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad