Allahabad High Court
A482/9174/2024 of AKHIL KUMAR YADAV AND 2 OTHERS Vs State of U.P. AND ANOTHER on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9174 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Abhinav Dwivedi, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Vimal Kumar, learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A.for the State. The supplementary affidavit, filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9174 of 2024
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Abhinav Dwivedi, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Vimal Kumar, learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A.for the State. The supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the applicants with the following prayer: "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the present application and quash the chargesheet dated 04.08.2023 and the entire proceeding of Case no. 10013 of 2023 (State vs Akhil and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 268 of 2023 under section 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 420, 494 IPC & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kotwali Gursahaiganj District Kannauj pending in court of Civil Judge Junior Division FTC- 3 Kannauj and for setting aside impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 17.10.2023 passed by Civil Judge Junior Division FTC-3 Kannauj"
3. Learned Counsel for applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that parties have amicably resolved their personal dispute, therefore, opposite party no.2 does not want to get adjudication of alleged criminal act and prayed that the aforesaid criminal case may be quashed in pursuance to compromise.
4. Learned A.G.A. for the State submits no objection if the parties approach Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhinav Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vimal Kumar Akhil Kumar Yadav And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Trial Court to file compromise in the given circumstances.
5. Whether the parties have entered into compromise, can best be adjudicated by the Trial Court. As such, the parties may appear before the Trial Court concerned and file the compromise entered into between the parties within 30 days, which shall be verified by the Trial Court.
6. No compromise shall be entertained by the Trial Court if the informant/victim/injured and accused are not signatories and appear before the Court of its verification. In case of exigency, the Trial Court shall apply its mind and pass appropriate order.
7. For a period of two months, the proceedings of the Trial Court shall be kept in abeyance, if the compromise is filed and verified within stipulated period, otherwise, the Trial Court shall continue with the trial.
8. All the parties, who files compromise and get it verified, shall then file a joint application invoking inherent power of this Court to quash the criminal proceeding.
9. In view of above, the application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is, accordingly, disposed of.
September 21, 2026 Vijay A482 No. 9174 of 2024 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad