Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22026/2026 of SOFIYAN AHMAD Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22026 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22026 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the first information report dated 10.05.2026, registered as Case Crime No. 0108 of 2026, under Sections 110, 352 of BNS, Police Station Gambhirpur, District Azamgarh against petitioner.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.2 and 3 not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of impugned first information report dated 10.05.2026, registered as Case Crime No. 0108 of 2026, under Sections 110, 352 of BNS, Police Station Gambhirpur, District Azamgarh."
2. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, learned AGA submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted charge sheet on 17.05.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, this writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents as well as Mr. Suryank Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nandini Pandey, Shubham Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Suryank Tripathi Sofiyan Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted on 17.05.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned, we do not find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. September 21, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 22026 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad