Allahabad High Court

WRIC/36461/2026 of SAURABH AGRAWAL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 20 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36461 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Heard Sri Girja Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjiv Dubey, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36461 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Heard Sri Girja Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjiv Dubey, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent Corporation as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to consider the representation dated 28.01.2026 & 12.05.2026 regarding mutation of the name of father of petitioner and legal heirs within in the Nagar Nigam record within some stipulated time." It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no. 3 vide representation dated 28.01.2026 which is still pending consideration. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation dated 28.01.2026 and decide the same within a period of two Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girja Shanker Mishra, Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C., Vijay Bahadur Maurya Saurabh Agrawal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. September 21, 2026 IrfanUddin WRIC No. 36461 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead