Allahabad High Court
CRLP/19903/2026 of TANU SINGH @ ROSHANI SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19903 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19903 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.3 Station House Officer, P.S. Rasra, District Ballia to conduct a fair and unbiased investigation in Case Crime No. 0238 of 2026, under Section 191 (1), 115 (2), 333, 64 (1), 352, 118(1), 110 of BNS, P.S. Rasra, District Ballia arising of FIR dated 05.07.2026."
2. Heard learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material on record.
3. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
4. It is submitted by learned AGA that in the instant matter, after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been forwarded on 05.09.2026 before the concerned Court and the police report has also been placed along with written instruction.
5. At this juncture, learned AGA submitted and prayed that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Pravesh Yadav, Shashank Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Tanu Singh @ Roshani Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
instant writ petition may be disposed of.
6. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned AGA and the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
7. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is accordingly dismissed. September 21,
C. MANI CRLP No. 19903 of 2026
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad