Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22029/2026 of AMRITPAL AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22029 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22029 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 16.01.2026 bearing as Case Crime No.0011 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 305(a) of BNS, Police Station- Adarsh Mandi, District-Shamli (Contained in Annexure No.2 to the writ petition).
(ii) . issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 not to take any coercive action against the petitioners and not arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report dated 16.01.2026 bearing as Case Crime No.0011 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 305(a) of BNS, Police Station- Adarsh Mandi, District-Shamli."
2. Learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted charge sheet on 25.06.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted and prayed that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, the instant writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to take appropriate remedy before appropriate court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Prajapati Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Amritpal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Heard Mr. S.K. Sharma, holding brief of Mr. Ramesh Prajapati, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Kailash Prakash Pathak, learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents as well as Mr. Veerpal Singh, holding brief of Ms. Chaman Aara, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3.
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the fact that after investigation the charge sheet has already been submitted and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned, we do not find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed. September 21, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 22029 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad