Allahabad High Court
CRLP/4345/2026 of GAJENDRA SINGH TEOTIA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 20 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4345 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4345 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to call the records and quash the impugned FIR dated 24.01.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0004 of 2026 under Section 191 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 305, 351 (3) BNS, P.S. Agauta, District Bulandshahr. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners or take any coercive action against them in pursuance of the impugned FIR dated 24.01.2026 during the pendency of the present petition before this Hon'ble Court."
2. Heard Mr. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Satyam Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Hemendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 as well as perused the material on record.
3. It is submitted by learned AGA that in the instant matter, after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been forwarded on 29.04.2026 before the concerned Court.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Keshav Kumar Srivastava, Saurav Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Hemendra Pratap Singh Gajendra Singh Teotia And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is accordingly dismissed. September 21, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 4345 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad