Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15035/2026 of VIRENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 17 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15035 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: " a . Issue a
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 15035 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "a. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the administrative transfer order dated 31.05.2026 passed by the respondent No.2 (Annexure No.1) to this writ petition.
b. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondents authority to decide the petitioner representation dated 05.06.2026, 27.08.2026, 31.08.2026, 08.09.2026 which is pending for disposal till date."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking quashing the administrative transfer order dated 31.05.2026 passed by the respondent No.2. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation dated 05.06.2026, 27.08.2026, 31.08.2026, 08.09.2026 which are pending consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent authority to decide the representations of the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Srivastava, Shiv Poojan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Virendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the aforementioned representations of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 18, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 15035 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad