Allahabad High Court
WRIC/37701/2026 of POONAWALA FINCORP LTD. Vs KRISHNA BAKERY AND 5 OTHERS on 17 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37701 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct array of petitioner during course of the day. 3.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37701 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct array of petitioner during course of the day.
3. The petitioner has preferred present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the court below i.e. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II Kanpur Nagar to expeditiously decide Misc. Case No.1188/2026 (Poonawala Fincorp vs. Krishna Bakery and others) within a short time bound period as may be determined by this Hon'ble Court under the facts and circumstances of the case."
4. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case respondents feels aggrieved by the order their right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
5. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that a considerable time has already lapsed but till date no decision has been taken on the same. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Sahai Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Poonawala Fincorp Ltd. .....Petitioner(s) Krishna Bakery And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Taking into consideration the nature of relief sought by the petitioner and without dwelling upon the merit of the matter, the petition is disposed of finally with the direction to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II Kanpur Nagar to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously and without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. September 18, 2026 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 37701 of 2026 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad