Allahabad High Court
WRIC/37514/2026 of RAGHAVRAM AND 2 OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS on 17 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37514 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Sri Paras Nath Rai, learned counsel
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37514 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Sri Paras Nath Rai, learned counsel for Union of India and Sri Anurag Yadav, learned counsel for National Highway Authority of India.
2. After an award was passed under the National Highways Act, 1956, the petitioners were to get their compensation. Subsequently, notice was issued to the petitioners on 01.04.2016 to receive the compensation. However, it is not clear from the record as to whether the documents as required by the notice dated 01.04.2016 have been supplied by the petitioners to the Prescribed Authority or not.
3. Under such circumstances, we direct that if the petitioners provide all the documents as are required by the Authority by means of notice dated 01.04.2016 within a period of two weeks, then the required compensation shall be paid to the petitioners within a period of two weeks thereafter. It is made clear that this order would be effective, provided there is no legal impediment in the payment of the compensation.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. September 18, 2026/Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Daya Shankar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Anurag Yadav, C.S.C., Paras Nath Rai (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Raghavram And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad