Allahabad High Court
WRIC/37690/2026 of DILIP KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER Vs NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS on 17 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37690 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent No. 2, and Shri Anurag Yadav,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37690 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent No. 2, and Shri Anurag Yadav, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 08.07.2026 passed in L.A.R. No. 07 of 2025, Vitula Devi Vs. Dilip Kumar Gupta & Ors., by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 6, Varanasi;
ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authority not to disburse compensation to the private respondent until determination of the title of the land and superstructures in the pending civil suits;
iii) Issue any suitable writ, order or direction in addition to and in supplement to refer to above, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
iv) Award the cost of the writ petition to the Petitioners."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
5. The certified copy of the impugned order shall be returned to learned counsel for the petitioners, if an application is filed before the Registry, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Purushottam Mani Tripathi, Shashvat Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anurag Yadav, C.S.C. Dilip Kumar Gupta And Another .....Petitioner(s) National Highway Authority Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
after retaining its photostat copy on record. September 18, 2026 Mukesh Kr. WRIC No. 37690 of 2026 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad