Allahabad High Court

WRIC/37648/2026 of RAGHUNATH Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37648 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. When the petitioner's land was sold to the respondent No. 3 under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 37648 of 2026

Court No. - 29

HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.

HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. When the petitioner's land was sold to the respondent No. 3 under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, the petitioner intended to transfer only 0.0426 hectare of land. However, it is the petitioner's case that, over and above the said area, an additional area measuring 0.0970 hectare has also been taken over.

2. At the very outset, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the Court that for redressal of grievance of tenure holders, claiming certain right/title over their land, the State Government had issued detailed Government Order dated 12.05.2016, which provides that in case the claimant files claim supported with requisite documents, the same would be considered by the District Level Committee for ensuring adequate compensation in the light of Act 2013. He submits that once the efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner, the matter should be relegated to the District Level Committee, which may examine the claim of petitioner within a reasonable time and submit its report to the Chairman/District Magistrate, who may accord adequate compensation accordingly.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the relief prayed in the instant matter, we dispose of the instant petition with liberty to the petitioner to make fresh representation along with true attested copy of the instant order before District Level Committee constituted under the Government Order dated 12.05.2016 within two weeks. In the event, such representation is made, the District Level Committee shall consider the claim of the petitioner and ensure that the proceeding shall be finalised expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, thereafter. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Imtyaz Ahmad, Kalp Dev Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jai Bahadur Singh Raghunath .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

4. The order has been passed in presence of Shri S.C. Dwivedi, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. September 18, 2026 Mukesh Kr. WRIC No. 37648 of 2026 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead