Allahabad High Court
BAIL/32295/2026 of GAURAV SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 17 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32295 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 1A. Learned counsel for the applicant hands up the supplementary affidavit
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32295 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 1A. Learned counsel for the applicant hands up the supplementary affidavit explaining the criminal history, the same is taken on record.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Gaurav Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 139 of 2026, under Sections 305(a), 317(2), 331(3) BNS, P.S.- Biwar, District- Hamirpur, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been implicated in the FIR dated 19.07.2026 lodged by the informant with the allegation against co-accused that he has entered the house of informant to commit theft. It is further contended that the name of accused/applicant has been figured out from the statement of co- accused. The accused/applicant has criminal history of six cases, wherein in two cases he is on bail and in four cases, the investigation is continuing and he has not been arrested. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 20.07.2026. He seeks to be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra, Om Prakash Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gaurav Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering that the name of accused/applicant has been figured out from the statement of co-accused, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 18, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 32295 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad