Allahabad High Court
WRIC/37372/2026 of HIRA SINGH RAWAT AND 48 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 16 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37372 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Lalit Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37372 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Lalit Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred inter alia for the following relief: "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents (especially Respondent No. 2 and 4) to execute sublease deed of flats of Aims Green, Avenue GH-04, Sector-04, Greater Noida West, Gautam Budh Nagar for Phase-1 ABCD Towers in favour of the petitioners/allottee (s) within specified by this Hon'ble Court.
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents (especially respondent no.2) to take appropriate decision upon the representations of the petitioners dated 27.07.2026 (Annexure No. 4) within time bound manner.
(c) Issue any other writ which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(d) Award the Cost of writ petition in favour of the petitioners." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalit Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh Hira Singh Rawat And 48 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer for a direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 27.07.2026 within the stipulated period. In support of his submission, he has placed reliance upon the judgment/order passed by the Division Bench in Writ-C No.58 of 2026, Deepak Kumar Dubey and 13 others v. State of U.P. and 3 others.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending consideration.
5. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of with an observation that the representation moved by the petitioners dated 27.07.2026 shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
September 17, 2026 NLY WRIC No. 37372 of 2026 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad