Allahabad High Court
CRLP/4631/2026 of SURENDRA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 16 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4631 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4631 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 12.02.2026, which was registered as Case Crime No. 49 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS and Section 3(2) (va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Sikrara, District Jaunpur (Annexure No. 1 to instant writ petition).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent nos. 1 to 3 not to harass and arrest the petitioners, pursuant to impugned first information report dated 12.02.2026, which was registered as Case Crime No. 49 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS and Section 3(2) (va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Sikrara, District Jaunpur (Annexure No. 1 to the instant writ petition).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded on 28.02.2026 before the court concerned and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in view of the aforesaid fact. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Bhardwaj Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Surendra Singh And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard Mr. Aditya Bharadwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, no objection raised by learned A.G.A. to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the fact that final report has already been forwarded, nothing is left for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 17, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 4631 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad