Allahabad High Court
WRIC/34733/2026 of MEHTAB ALAM AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 16 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34733 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Standing Counsel and Sri Jai Bahadur Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos.2 to 4. 2. The
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 34733 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Standing Counsel and Sri Jai Bahadur Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos.2 to 4.
2. The grievance of the petitioners is that their land which had become unusable because of the construction of the expressway, they had requested the Uttar Pradesh Expressways Industrial Development Authority (henceforth called the "UPEIDA") to make the expressway in such a manner that the Petrol Pump may not become unusable. The UPEIDA, in its turn, passed an order dated 7.8.2025 wherein it was provided that a plot may be provided elsewhere. However, the order dated 7.8.2025 has, till date, not been honoured.
3. From the record, we find that the petitioners had also represented on 24.6.2026 before the Chief Executive Officer, UPEIDA.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 states that the application filed by the petitioners would itself be looked into and shall be decided expeditiously.
5. Under such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the representation dated 24.6.2026 filed by the petitioners be decided by the respondent no.2 after giving a proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, within a period of one month from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. September 17, 2026 GS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Sahai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jai Bahadur Singh (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Mehtab Alam And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM SONI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad