Allahabad High Court

WRIC/27719/2026 of PRASHANT KUMAR GUPTA Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS on 16 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27719 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohit Behari Mathur learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and Sri Ajay Singh, for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. 2. By means of this

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 27719 of 2026

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Mohit Behari Mathur learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and Sri Ajay Singh, for the respondent nos. 1 and 2.

2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for disposal of his application for issuance of passport pending with the concerned Regional Passport Officer.

3. Per contra, it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioner has been issued with the show cause notice to explain about the following criminal case which is pending against him:

(i) Case Crime No.-1215 of 2028, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Dhoomanganj, District - Prayagraj.

4. In our considered view, petitioner should, in the first instance, take steps according to the guidelines and follow the procedures laid down in the judgment of this Court in the case of Rahimuddin vs. Union of India & Another (Neutral Citation No. 2025:AHC:181505-DB) and recently in the case of Wajiruddin Khan v. Union of India & 2 Others, (Neutral Citation No. 2026:AHC:138176-DB) and thereafter, the Regional Passport Officer concerned shall dispose of the application of the petitioner in accordance with guidelines laid down and timeline provided in the aforesaid judgments.

5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arnab Banerji, Mohit Behari Mathur Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., A.S.G.I., Ajay Singh Prashant Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

disposed of. September 17, 2026 piyush WRIC No. 27719 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead