Allahabad High Court
CRLP/21773/2026 of INFORMANT Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 16 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21773 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21773 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Certiorari for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 07.05.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0154 of 2026, under Sections 75, 115 (2) of BNS and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act,, Police Station Dataganj, District Budaun (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) and submit the charge sheet expeditiously within a short period so expeditiously by this Court.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the of Mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to arrest to the monitor and ensure the fair ad impartial investigation pursuant to the First Information Report dated 07.05.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0154 of 2026, under Sections 75, 115 (2) of BNS and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act,, Police Station Dataganj, District Budaun."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been submitted to the Court concerned and the cognizance has already been taken by the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State the instant writ petition may be disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Somwati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed.
September 17, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 21773 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad