Allahabad High Court
CRLP/20080/2026 of MUDIT JAIN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 16 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20080 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20080 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 16.04.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0108 of 2026, under Sections 2(7), 2(8), 2(9), 2(14), 2(15), 2(31), 2(38), 318(1), 318(4), 335, 336(2), 338, 340(2), 60, 61(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 Police Station Hari Parwat, District Agra.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 not to arrest or harass the petitioner in pursuance to the impugned first information report dated 16.04.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0108 of 2026, under Sections 2(7), 2(8), 2(9), 2(14), 2(15), 2(31), 2(38), 318(1), 318(4), 335, 336(2), 338, 340(2), 60, 61(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 Police Station Hari Parwat, District Agra."
2. Mr. Satyendra Nath Tiwari, learned AGA submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted final report on 10.07.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of the statement given by the learned AGA, the instant writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard Mr. Satish Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Nath Tiwari, learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mudit Jain .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that after completion of the investigation, Investigating Officer has submitted the final report and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned, nothing left in this petition for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. September 17, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 20080 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad