Allahabad High Court
CRLP/5291/2026 of SATYENDRA VERMA AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 16 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5291 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. During the course of the argument, learned AGA produced the copy of the cognizance order dated 08.06.2026, which has been perused by the Court. The
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5291 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. During the course of the argument, learned AGA produced the copy of the cognizance order dated 08.06.2026, which has been perused by the Court. The same is taken on record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 24.11.2025 lodged by the respondent no.3 being Case Crime No.0101 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 351(3), 74, 76 of BNS and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District-Bareilly (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition). B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance to the impugned FIR dated 24.11.2025 lodged by the respondent no.3 being Case Crime No.0101 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 351(3), 74, 76 of BNS and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District-Bareilly."
3. Learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted charge sheet and thereupon cognizance has already been taken by the concerned court on 08.06.2026. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vidya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pradeep Kumar Satyendra Verma And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by the learned AGA, the instant writ petition may be disposed of.
5. Heard Mr. Vidya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned AGA-I appearing for the State-respondents as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3.
6. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the fact that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted in the matter and the court concerned has also taken cognizance of the offence vide order dated 08.06.2026, therefore, we do not find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. September 17, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 5291 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad