Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22278/2026 of AJEET KUMAR VERMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22278 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22278 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R dated 10.7.2026 in Case Crime No.0170 of 2026, U/S 115(2), 352, 351(3), 85 B.N.S., P.S-Chitaipur, District Varanasi against the petitioner. (Annexure No.1 to this writ petition).
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing respondent No.3 not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the F.I.R dated 10.7.2026 in Case Crime No.0170 of 2026, U/S 115(2), 352, 351(3), 85 B.N.S., P.S. -Chitaipur, District - Varanasi."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been forwarded on 12.08.2026 to the Court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy under the law as advised.
4. Mr. Mohd. Waseem, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 has no objection.
5. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State, Mr. Mohd. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bairister Singh, Kavita Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ajeet Kumar Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Waseem, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 and perused the material available on record.
6. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State that the charge sheet has already been forwarded and no objection from learned counsel for respondent no.4 as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy under the law as advised. September 16, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 22278 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad