Allahabad High Court
CRLP/3118/2025 of DESHVEER AND 30 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3118 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- " A . Issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3118 of 2025
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 23.01.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 13 of 2025, under Sections 352, 351(3), 324(4), 329(3) and 223 Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 2, 3 and 4 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, Police Station Chandi Nagar, District Baghpat. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned first information report dated 23.01.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 13 of 2025, under Sections 352, 351(3), 324(4), 329(3) and 223 Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and 2, 3 and 4 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 Police Station Chandi Nagar, District Baghpat."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners apprised the Court that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has been forwarded to the Court concerned. He further submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the aforesaid fact.
3. Learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State has not contradicted the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akash Tomar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rama Nand Shukla, G.A., Mani Shanker Pandey Deshveer And 30 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
facts as submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 16, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 3118 of 2025 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad