Allahabad High Court
WRIC/36953/2026 of DEV NARAYAN CHAUHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36953 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the Stated and learned counsel appearing for the private respondents. 2. This writ petition has
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 36953 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the Stated and learned counsel appearing for the private respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the authority concern to remove the "Poultry Farm" operated by respondent Nos. 5 and 6 just adjacent to House of Petitioner at Village Naraksh (Habsaha) Post- Chintamanipur, Tehsil-Rasra, District-Ballia. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the District Magistrate, Ballia to decide the complaint/ representation of the petitioner dated 27.02.2026, pending before him, within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. From the perusal of the writ petition it appears that the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the respondents no. 5 and 6 are running a poultry farm in the neighbourhood of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the running of the poultry farm causes severe pollution.
4. If that is the case then the petitioner can avail the appropriate remedy of approaching the Pollution Control Board.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 16, 2026 M.S. Ansari Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shitlesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., J.N. Maurya (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Dev Narayan Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad