Allahabad High Court
WRIC/35725/2026 of COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT ACHARYA PANDIT SURESH DATTA TRIPATHI VIDYA MANDIR SHIKSHA SAMITI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35725 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in causing interference in peaceful functioning of institution namely
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35725 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in causing interference in peaceful functioning of institution namely Acharya Pandit Suresh Datta Tripathi Vidya Mandir Shiksha Samiti, Village and Post Badahalganj, District Gorakhpur situated over the land, which is claimed to be the land belonging to Narcotics Department, Government of India. It is sought to be contended that there are various other buildings and the petitioner-institution is being run since 1990. Upon perusal of the Khatauni, it is reflected that only possession is recorded in favour of the institution whereas the land in question belongs to Narcotics Department, Government of India.
3. In the given facts and circumstances, no relief as such can be granted to the petitioner by this Court. However, petitioner can institute a suit on the basis of possession, if so advised subject of-course its legal maintainability.
4. Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 16, 2026 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deo Prakash Singh, Shubham Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Committee Of Management Acharya Pandit Suresh Datta Tripathi Vidya Mandir Shiksha Samiti And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad