Allahabad High Court
CRLP/4059/2026 of SANDEEP AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4059 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- " a ) Issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4059 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 06.02.2026 registered as Case Crime No.0101 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352, 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station - Balaut, District - Baghpat (Annexure No. 1 to this Writ Petition).
b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report dated 06.02.2026 registered as Case Crime No.0101 of 2026, under Sections 115(2) 352, 109(1) Β.N.S., Police Station - Badaut, District - Baghpat."
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised list. Sri S.N. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State is present.
3. We have perused the office report dated 15.09.2026, which shows that the steps have not been taken by the petitioners.
4. Taking into consideration the fact that non-compliance of order dated 08.04.2026 and non-appearance on behalf of the petitioners, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 16, 2026 Atul Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Naushad Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Sandeep And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad