Allahabad High Court
WRIC/29917/2026 of SMT SAMUNDARI DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29917 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Sudhanshu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Standing Counsel, and perused the record. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 29917 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Sudhanshu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Standing Counsel, and perused the record.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any notice being issued to him, the order dated 23.07.2026 has been passed directing demolition of the construction existing over Plot No. 215 admeasuring 0.0421 Ha (504.16 Square Gaj), Village Ghanghaula, Pargana Dankaur, Tehsil Sadar, District- Gautam Budh Nagar.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the Greater Noida Authorities, Sri Vineet Pandey, states that the instant order may be treated as a notice and that the petitioner may submit his reply thereto.
4. In view of the aforesaid, we provide that, in case the petitioner submits a representation within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, within a period of two months thereafter.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
6. It is made clear that, till the decision on the representation is taken or for a period of three months from today, whichever is earlier no demolition shall be carried out, if the same has not already taken place. September 16, 2026 vijay krishna Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Chandra, Sudhanshu Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C., Vineet Pandey (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Smt Samundari Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad