Allahabad High Court
CRLP/4032/2026 of SHIKHA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4032 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- " A . Issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4032 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 03.02.2026 in Case Crime No. 37 of 2026, under Section 137(2) B.N.S. 2023, Police Station Mau, District Chitrakoot lodged by respondent no. 4. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing respondent nos. 2 to 4 not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 03.02.2026 in Case Crime No. 37 of 2026, under Sections 137(2) B.N.S. 2023, Police Station Mau, District Chitrakoot lodged by respondent no. 4."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation final report has already been forwarded on 22.04.2026 to the Court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State the instant writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard Mr. Tahir Ali, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tahir Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajay Kumar Pal, G.A., Vikrant Pratap Singh Shikha And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State that the final report has already been forwarded as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 16, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 4032 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad