Allahabad High Court
CRLP/3902/2025 of DEVAKI NANDAN SHARMA (CORRECT NAME DEVAKI NANDAN BHARDWAJ Vs STATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3902 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3902 of 2025
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 13.05.2014 having Case Crime No. 191 of 2014 Under Section 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of IPC, Police Station Musran, District Hathras lodged by the Respondent no. 6.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus pleased to direct the Respondent no. 2 and 3 not to arrest the petitioner in Case Crime No. 191 of 2014 Under Section 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, of IPC, Police station Musran, District Hathras, during the pendency of the present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court."
2. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the Court, however, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State is present.
3. Vide order dated 28.02.2025 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, notice was issued to respondent no. 6 and the arrest of the petitioner was stayed.
4. As per report dated 06.11.2025, learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shantanu Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Devaki Nandan Sharma (Correct Name Devaki Nandan Bhardwaj .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner has not taken steps to serve the notice upon the respondent no. 6.
5. Heard learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and peruse the record.
6. Taking into consideration the non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner as well as non-compliance of the order dated 28.02.2025, as stated above, we do not find any reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
7. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed.
8. Interim order, granted earlier, stands vacated. September 16, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 3902 of 2025 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad