Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22283/2026 of VISHAL YADAV AND 6 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 15 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22283 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22283 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 17.09.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0272 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) 352 of B.N.S. and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station Syed Raja, District Chandauli (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition.)
II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of present F.I.R. dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition.)"
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been forwarded on 31.03.2026 to the Court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy under the law as advised.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 and perused the material available on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pushpendra Kumar Yadav, Shreya Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Neeraj Kumar Singh Vishal Yadav And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy under the law as advised. September 16, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 22283 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad