Allahabad High Court
BAIL/32585/2026 of SANDEEP Vs STATE OF U.P. on 13 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32585 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Garun Pal Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32585 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Garun Pal Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Sandeep to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 104 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) of BNS, P.S.- Mursan, District- Hathras during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for accused applicant that the accused applicant has been implicated belatedly in FIR dated 4.5.2026 lodged by the father of the injured with the allegation that on 3.5.2026 at about 22:45 hours co-accused Ravi has called his son Dheeraj when his bike was out of order. There was some altercation between co-accused and injured Dheeraj, who had assaulted him with lathi, danda and sariya. The injured suffered six injuries out of which, two injuries are grievous in nature which are fracture of nasal bone and ulna bone. It is further contended that there is no injuries of gun shot. There is no specific role assigned to the accused applicant. No recovery of the weapons. The investigation is continuing. He is co-operating in the investigation. The applicant has four cases criminal history, in which, he is on bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 30.7.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Garun Pal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering the nature and number of injuries and sudden fight between the parties, the accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 14, 2026 Krishna* BAIL No. 32585 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad