Allahabad High Court
BAIL/30123/2026 of JAFAR @ RAMAN KALIYA Vs STATE OF U.P. on 13 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30123 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit has been filed explaining criminal history, the same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Jalal Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30123 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Supplementary affidavit has been filed explaining criminal history, the same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Jalal Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Jafar @ Raman Kaliya to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 389 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of BNS, P.S.- Bhojipura, District- Bareilly during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for accused applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated by the police in FIR dated 8.6.2026 with the allegation that the accused applicant have opened fire on the police party. It is further contended that none of the police persons suffered injury. The arrest and recovery has been made in absence of the independent witness. The charge sheet has been submitted. The accused applicant has criminal history of 33 cases, out of which, in 30 cases, he is on bail. Thirty bail orders have been annexed along with the bail application and three bail orders could not traceable. The applicant is languishing in jail since 16.6.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jalaj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jafar @ Raman Kaliya .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering the no injury case, the accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 14, 2026 Krishna* BAIL No. 30123 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad