Allahabad High Court
CRLP/21208/2026 of SANTOSH KUMAR CHAUDHARY @ SANTOSH KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 13 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21208 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21208 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 24.06.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0341 of 2026 under Sections 292, 318(4) and 319(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Azamgarh, as well as consequential proceedings arising therefrom, in the interest of justice. (Contained as Annexure No. 1).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to respondents not to arrest the Petitioners in pursuance to the impugned F.I.R. and not to adopt any coercive action against the petitioners."
2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, chargesheet has been forwarded on 28.07.2026.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.
4. Heard Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh Paliwal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 as also Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Singh, Mohd Kamil, Pratiksha Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pramod Kumar Singh Paliwal Santosh Kumar Chaudhary @ Santosh Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been submitted, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 14,
Shweta CRLP No. 21208 of 2026
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad