Allahabad High Court

CRLP/19878/2026 of HEERA LAL SHARMA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS on 13 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19878 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19878 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 29.03.2026 arising out of Case Crime No. 0188 of 2026 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(1) of B.N.S.-2023 and under Sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(dh), 3(2)(v) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station-Bhojipura, District-Bareilly.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to respondents not to arrest the Petitioners in pursuance to the impugned F.I.R. and not to adopt any coercive action against the petitioners."

2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, chargesheet has been submitted and the concerned court has already taken cognizance.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.

4. Heard Shri Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. R.K. Gupta, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that chargesheet has already been submitted, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 14, 2026 Shweta Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amal Kumar Srivastava, Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sudarshan Singh (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Heera Lal Sharma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead