Allahabad High Court

WRIC/19304/2023 of RAJ KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 19304 of 2023 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the relief has already been granted hence, no further order is required. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 19304 of 2023

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the relief has already been granted hence, no further order is required.

2. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 11, 2026 gp Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead