Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14467/2026 of PHOOL CHANDRA Vs STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER on 10 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14467 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed for following relief:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 14467 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed for following relief:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the revision under Rule-23 of U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal), Rule-1991 dated 20.04.2026 filed by the petitioner before the respondent no. 2 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, pending before him."
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that aforementioned revision is pending consideration and he prayed that same may be decided expeditiously.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the revision, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided there is no other legal impediment. September 11, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mirza Faheem Beg Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Phool Chandra .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad