Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Sh. Madan Kaushik & 07 Ors., vs MCD on 21 May 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Item No.-01
ID No. 42/2023 21st, May, 2025
Present:
Sh. Karunesh Shah, Ld. AR along with one of the claimant Sh. Rakesh Kumar. Sh. Manik Ahluwalia, Ld. AR along with Sh. Bubulal Meena (School Inspector) for the management. Sh. Satish Kumar, Ld. AR for the management.
At the outset, counsel for the respondent has stated that the reference is liable to be rejected because the workmen have been reinstated w.e.f. November, 2020 and they have been paid the salary for the month of August, 2020. Therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this reference now.
Record perused. Appropriate government vide letter dated 06.02.2023 had sent the reference to this Tribuanl in the following words:
“Whether demands of Delhi Nagar Nigam Sarve Karamchari Bhartiya Lokhit Morcha, Delhi i.r.t. Sh. Madan Kaushik & 7 Others (list attached) vide letter dated 08.10.2020 against the management of South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) regarding reinstatement of Sh. Mohan Kaushik & 7 Others back into service and payment of wages for the month of August, 2020 are proper, legal and justified? If yes, then for what reliefs the workers are entitled? What directions, if any, are necessary in the matter?”
Sh. Rakesh Kumar, one of the claimant amongst 8 claimants has stated that all the workmen herein have been reinstated by the management w.e.f. November, 2020 and they have been paid the salary for the month of August, 2020. His statement is recorded separately. In view of the above statement, nothing remains in this reference to decide. Hence, their claim stands dismissed as satisfied. Reference is answered accordingly. A copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947. File is consigned to record room.
ATUL KUMAR GARG Presiding Officer CGIT-cum-labour court-II