Allahabad High Court
CRLP/19542/2026 of ARUN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19542 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Vachaspati Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, learned AGA for the State respondents and Mr. Santosh Kumar
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19542 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Vachaspati Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, learned AGA for the State respondents and Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted and apprised the Court that the sole petitioner has been arrested and sent to jail, therefore, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the private respondent have no objection to the aforesaid facts.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 9, 2026 Prajapati RK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Pandey, Vachaspati Panday Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Singh, Vishal Kumar Sonkar (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Arun .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad