Allahabad High Court
BAIL/30605/2026 of VANDANA JOSHI Vs STATE OF U.P. on 8 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30605 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30605 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 245 of 2025, under Sections- 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) BNS, Police Station- Civil Lines, District- Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of the trial. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the subject case. It is submitted that the applicant is working in Senemi Consulting Pvt. Ltd. company on the post of agent in salary basis. It is submitted that the work and conduct of the applicant is only convinced the customers, neither she has received single amount in his personal bank account or cash. It is submitted that the main accused Amit Gautam, who is Managing Director, has already granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.5.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 43785 of 2025. It is next submitted that applicant is having no concern with the allegations levelled against her and she has not committed any offence as alleged by prosecution. It is next submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. Criminal history of the applicant has been duly explained in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Sandeep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vandana Joshi .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
para 20 of the bail application and she is languishing in jail since 02.06.2026. It is also submitted that the applicant undertakes that she will not misuse the liberty, if granted on the ground of parity. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. Let applicant, Vandana Joshi be released on bail in the aforesaid case on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(i) . The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) . The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii) . The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
(iv) . The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
(v) . The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted. BAIL No. 30605 of 2026
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 9, 2026 Brijesh BAIL No. 30605 of 2026
(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad