Allahabad High Court

CRLP/19471/2026 of SUBASH PRAJAPATI AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19471 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 15.11.2025 registered as Case Crime

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19471 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 15.11.2025 registered as Case Crime No.0232 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) B.N.S. Police Station - Dakshin Tola, District - Mau and for a direction to the respondent no. 3 not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.

2. Heard Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vijay Kumar Srivastava learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material on record.

3. It is submitted by learned AGA that in the instant matter, after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been forwarded on 09.12.2025 before the concerned Court.

4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted, we do not find any good reason to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Subash Prajapati And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

keep this petition pending for further adjudication.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. September 9,

SK Srivastava CRLP No. 19471 of 2026

(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead