Allahabad High Court
CRLP/20755/2026 of MANOJ BHATI @ MANOJ KUMAR BHATI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20755 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20755 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 of the impugned first information report dated 10.09.2019, registered as Case Crime No. 1417 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC at police station Sihani Gate, District Ghaziabad to conclude the investigation int he light of charge sheet submitted by the CBI on 30.06.2022 upon same cause of action wherein cognizance has been taken by the court against actual accused persons and in that charge sheet petitioner and informant are mentioned as witnesses. ii). Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at some length on merit, made an innocuous prayer that the investigating agency may be directed to conclude the pending investigation qua the Case Crime No.Case Crime No. 1417 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC at police station Sihani Gate, District Ghaziabad, expeditiously.
3. Per contra, Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, learned AGA vehemently opposed the writ petition but could not dispute in regard to the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard Mr. Vivek Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pallavi Mishra, Vivek Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Manoj Bhati @ Manoj Kumar Bhati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
the learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.
5. Taking into consideration the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the no objection by the learned AGA, the instant writ petition is disposed of with direction to the investigating agency to conclude the investigation of Case Crime No. 1417 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC at Police Station Sihani Gate, District Ghaziabad, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before it. September 9, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 20755 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad