Allahabad High Court

A482/47667/2019 of LALCHANDRA YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 8 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 47667 of 2019 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. Ref:- Criminal Misc. Modification Application No. 1 of 2020 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State on modification application. 2. The modification

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 47667 of 2019

Court No. - 83

HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

Ref:- Criminal Misc. Modification Application No. 1 of 2020

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State on modification application.

2. The modification application is dismissed. Ref: Order on Application U/s. 482 Cr.P.C

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 6087 of 2019 (State Vs. Lalchandra) arising out of Case Crime No. 242 of 2017, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC, Police Station Saraimamrez, District Allahabad pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 7, District Allahabad as well as impugned Charge-sheet dated 25.09.2018 submitted by the Investigating Officer against the applicant before the learned court below in Criminal Case No. 6087 of 2019 (State Vs. Lalchandra) arising out of Case Crime No. 242 of 2017, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC, Police Station Saraimamrez, District Allahabad.

3. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Om Prakash Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Bhaiya Lal Yadav, G.A. Lalchandra Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

5. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

6. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that applicant shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

7. For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

8. With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C stands disposed of. September 9, 2026 Vikram A482 No. 47667 of 2019 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead