Allahabad High Court
CRLP/21373/2026 of UJJWAL KUMAR JAISAWAL Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS on 7 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21373 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21373 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 27.07.2026 in Case Crime No. 0228 of 2026, U/s 331(3), 305 of BNS, 2023 at P.S. -Vishupura, District Kushinagar. (Annexure No.1 to this writ petition).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest the Petitioner impugned First Information Report dated 27.07.2026 in Case Crime No. 0228 of 2026, U/s 331 (3), 305 of BNS, 2023 at P.S. -Vishupura, District Kushinagar."
2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been submitted on 23.08.2026.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.
4. Heard Mr. Jagat Singh, learned Advocate holding brief of Mr. Rajneesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajneesh Kumar Srivastava, Smt. Priyanka Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ujjwal Kumar Jaisawal .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
of the petitioner, Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been submitted, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 8, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 21373 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad