Allahabad High Court
WRIC/34183/2026 of ROHIT KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS on 7 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34183 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayer:- " a . Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 34183 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayer:- "a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to renew / reissue the passport bearing Passport No. N1904025 having ARN No. 26-0072727497 (File No. LKE077939087826) of the Petitioner expeditiously within the stipulated period and hand over to the Petitioner."
2. It reveals from perusal of the records that after the petitioner submitted an application in this regard, the letter dated 05.08.2026 was written by the Regional Passport Office, Lucknow to the petitioner to report in person in his office within 30 days along with all the relevant documents.
3. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner that he will comply with the terms and conditions as mentioned in the letter dated 05.08.2026.
4. In this view of the matter and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally permitting the petitioner to comply with the terms and conditions as mentioned in the letter dated 05.08.2026 and Respondent No.3 namely Regional Passport Officer, Passport Bhawan, Lucknow will pass appropriate order on the same, strictly in accordance with law as per law laid down in the case of Pawan Kumar Rajbhar Vs. Union of India and 2 Others, Supreme Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shashank Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. Rohit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
(All) 1870. September 8, 2026 Swati WRIC No. 34183 of 2026 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad